Serialisation and the Falsified Medicines Directive: Keeping the Supply Chain Safe

Since February 2019, almost every prescription medicine pack in the EU has carried two safety features — a unique 2D barcode and an anti-tampering device — designed to keep falsified medicines out of the legal supply chain. Compliance is not a one-off packaging change but an ongoing obligation that touches manufacturing, data management and the wider distribution network.

The legal framework

The Falsified Medicines Directive (2011/62/EU) introduced harmonised measures across the EU to protect patients from falsified medicines. Its detailed rules on safety features are set out in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/161, which has applied since 9 February 2019. Together they require two safety features on the packaging of most prescription medicines:

  • a unique identifier — a 2D data-matrix barcode carrying a product code, a randomised serial number, batch number and expiry date; and
  • an anti-tampering device that shows whether a pack has been opened.

How verification works

The system is built on an end-to-end verification model. Manufacturers upload the unique identifiers to a shared repository — the European Medicines Verification System (EMVS) — which connects to national verification systems. At the point of dispensing, a pharmacy scans the barcode, checks it against the database and decommissions it, so the same identifier cannot be reused. A now well-established European network links thousands of manufacturers, wholesalers and pharmacies to this system.

What it means for marketing-authorisation holders

Responsibility for the data underpinning the system rests largely with the marketing-authorisation holder:

  • generating compliant unique identifiers and applying them at the point of manufacture;
  • uploading and maintaining accurate product master data in the EMVS;
  • managing alerts when a pack fails verification, which must be investigated;
  • coordinating with contract manufacturers and packaging sites to ensure serialisation is applied correctly.

Common compliance gaps

  • Inaccurate or incomplete master data, which generates false alerts and disrupts dispensing.
  • Weak processes for investigating and resolving alerts, which can be an early signal of falsification.
  • Poorly defined responsibilities between the MAH, contract manufacturers and on-boarding partners.
  • Overlooking national variations in scope and implementation across member states.

How PQRA helps

PQRA helps marketing-authorisation holders and manufacturers meet their obligations under the Falsified Medicines Directive — from serialisation and EMVS on-boarding to master-data management, alert handling and the technical agreements that keep contract sites compliant. We help you treat safety-feature compliance as an ongoing quality process rather than a one-off project.

Contact PQRA for support with serialisation and FMD compliance.

CATEGORIES:

Uncategorized

Tags:

No responses yet

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Comments

No comments to show.